Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Facultad de Educación
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
 
Inglés
Portugués
Magis
Magis Misión Contenido Equipo editorial Artículos Servicios de información Suscripción y canje Enlaces
1
Yuxtaponiendo algunos hallazgos contradictorios de investigaciones acerca de la elección escolar
Juxtaposing some contradictory findings from research on school choice
Juxtaposant quelques trouvailles contradictoires de recherches autour du choix
scolaire
Justapondo alguns descobrimentos contraditórios de pesquisas feitas sobre a
escolha escolar
 
Anthony Kelly, University Of Southampton, Highfield, England
 

Resumen
Las investigaciones durante los últimos veinte años acerca de la elección escolar y los mercados locales en educación han sido contradictorias o no han sido conclusivas: algunas apoyan la iniciativa de dar a los padres mayor libertad a la hora de elegir escuelas; otros resultados sostienen que la postura de que una mayor selección incrementa las desventajas en quienes ya son menos favorecidos. Sin tener en cuenta la posición filosófica, se puede decir que la elección escolar depende de la economía política en que sus beneficios y defectos son consecuencia del compromiso con los imperativos políticos o socio-económicos. Este texto yuxtapone algunos resultados del Reino Unido, Estados unidos y Europa en un contexto socio-político y discute sus implicaciones teóricas.

Palabras clave
Elección escolar.

Palabras clave descriptor
Elección escolar, investigaciones, elección escolar, aspectos sociopolíticos.

Transferencia a la práctica
Este extracto reúne investigaciones internacionales sobre la elección escolar y permitirá a los políticos y líderes escolares comprender mejor sus beneficios y desventajas.

Referencias
Adnett, N. & Davies, P. (2003). Schooling reforms in England: from quasi-markets to co-opetition? Journal of Education Policy, 18 (4), 393-406.
Ahonen, S. (2000). What happens to the common school in the market? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32 (4), 483-494.
Armey, R. K. & Jefferson, W. J. (1991). Should school choice be included in Federal education reform? Congressional Digest, 70, 298-313.
Arrow, K. J. (1984). the economics of agency. In J. W. Pratt & R. J. Zeck- hauser (eds.). Principals and agents: the structure of business. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Bagley, C. (1996). Black and white unite or flight? the racialised dimension of schooling and parental choice. British Educational Research Journal, 22 (5), 569-580.
Bagley, C.; Woods, P. a. & glatter, R. (2001). Rejecting schools: towards a fuller understanding of the process of parental choice. School Lead-ership & Management, 21 (3), 309-325.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policymaking in education. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2003). Class strategies and the education market: the middle
classes and social advantage. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ball, S. J., Bowe, R. & gewirtz, S. (1995). Circuits of schooling: a sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts. The Sociological Review, 43 (1), 52-78.
Ball, S. J., Bowe, R. & gewirtz, S. (1996). School choice, social class and
distinction: the realization of social advantage in education. Journal of Education Policy, 11 (1), 89-112.
Ball, S. & Vincent, C. (2001). New class relations in education: the strategies of the ‘fearful’ middle-classes. In J. Demaine (ed.). Sociology of Education Today. London: Palgrave. Bamber, C. (1990). Public school choice: will we be ready? Education Digest, 55, 19-22.
Barton, D. (1995). The myth of separation. aledo, texas: WallBuilders.
Bauch, P. a. & goldring, E. B. (1995). Parent involvement and school responsiveness: facilitating the home-school connection in schools of choice. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17 (1), 1-21.
Beck, U. (1999). World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity. Belfield, C. (2003). Political preferences and the privatization of education: evidence from the United Kingdom. Education Economics, 11 (2),
155-168.
Bernal, J. L. (2005). Parental choice, social class and market forces: the consequences of privatization of public services in education. Journal of Education Policy, 20 (6), 779-792.
Bhanji, Z. (2008). transnational corporations in education: filling the governance gap through new social norms and market multilateralism? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6 (1), 55-73.
Bodine, E., Fuller, B., gonzález, M., Huerta, L., Naughton, S., Park, S. & teh, L. (2008). Disparities in charter school resources - the influence of state policy and community. Journal of Education Policy, 23 (1), 1-33.
Bosetti, L. (1998). Canada’s charter schools: initial report. Kelowna, British Co- lumbia: Society for the advancement of Excellence in Education, SaEE.
Bosetti, L. (2000). Alberta charter schools: paradox and promises. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46 (2), 179-190.
Bosetti, L. (2001). Can markets save our schools? the alberta charter school experience. In C. Hepburn (ed.). Can markets save our schools? Vancouver, British Columbia: Fraser Institute.
Bosetti, L. (2004). Determinants of school choice: understanding how parents choose elementary schools in alberta. Journal of Education Policy, 19 (4), 387-405.
Bottery, M. (1994). Lessons for schools? A comparison of business and educational anagement. London: Cassell.
Bridges, D. & McLaughlin, t. (1994). Education and the market place: an introduction. In D. Bridges & t. McLaughlin (eds.). Education and the market place London: Falmer Press.
Brighouse, H. (1998). Why states should fund schools? British Journal of Educational Studies, 46 (2), 138-151.
Brighouse, H. (2003). against privatizing schools in the United Kingdom. London Review of Education, 1 (1), 35-46.
Buchanan, N. & Fox, R. (2008). Every school a school of choice: school choice in Ireland as viewed through american eyes. Irish Educational Studies, 27 (3), 267-279.
Bulkley, K. (2005). Understanding the charter school concept in legislation: the cases of arizona, Michigan and georgia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18 (4), 527-554.
Bush, t.; Coleman, M. & glover, D. (1993). Managing autonomous schools. London: Paul Chapman.
Butler, t. (1995). the debate over the middle classes. In t. Butler & M. Sava- ge (eds.). Social change and the middle classes. London: University College Press.
Butler, t.; Hamnett, C.; Ramsden, M. & Webber, R. (2007). the best, the worst and the average: secondary school choice and education per- formance in East London. Journal of Education Policy, 22 (1), 7-29.
Butler, t. & van Zanten, a. (2007). School choice: a European perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 22 (1), 1-5.
Califano, J. & Bennett, W. (2000). the need for school choice. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 30th, g1.
Case, R. B. (1996). Incompatible with Christian teaching. Christian Social Action, 9, 7-9.
Chiu, M. M. & Ho, E. S. C. (2006). Family effects on student achievement in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26 (1), 21-35.
Chubb, J. & Moe, t. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Was- hington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Chubb, J. & Moe, t. (1992). Why markets are good for education. In P. R. Kane (ed.). Independent Schools, Independent Thinkers. San Francis- co, California: Jossey Bass.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Ame- rican Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Coleman, J., Hoffer, t. & Kilgore, S. (1982). High school achievement: pu- blic, private and Catholic schools compared. New York: Basic Books.
Collet, B. (2007). Islam, national identity and public secondary education: perspectives from the Somali diaspora in toronto, Canada. Race Eth- nicity and Education, 10 (2), 131-153.
Collins, J. (2005). Schooling for faith, citizenship and social mobility: Ca- tholic secondary education in New Zealand, 1924-1944. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 37 (2), 157-172.
Colopy, K. W. & tarr, H. C. (1994). Minnesota’s public school choice options. Washington, D.C.: Policy Studies associates.
Conway, S. (1997). the reproduction of exclusion and disadvantage: sym- bolic violence and social class inequalities in ‘parental choice’ of se- condary education. Sociological Research On-line, 2 (4). accessed: November 25th, 2008. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/4/4.html.
Cooper, C. W. (2007). School choice as ‘motherwork’: valuing african- american women’s educational advocacy and resistance. Internatio- nal Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20 (5), 491-512.
Crooks, S. (1999). Ordering risk. In D. Lupton (ed.). Risk and sociocultu- ral theory: new directions and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cush, D. (2005). the faith schools debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26 (3), 435-442.
Davis-Kean, P. (2005). the influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19 (2), 294-304.
Denessen, E.; Driessena, g. & Sleegers, P. (2005). Segregation by choice? a study of group-specific reasons for school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 20 (3), 347-368.
Department for Education and Skills, DfES (2001). Schools achieving suc- cess. Norwich: Stationery Office.
Doerr E. & Menéndez, a. J. (1991). Church schools and public money. Bu- ffalo, New York: Prometheus.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Sage.
Downey, D. (1994). the school performance of children from single-mother and single-father families: economic or interpersonal deprivation? Journal of Family Issues, 15 (1), 129-147.
Driessen, g. & van der Slik, F. (2001). Religion, denomination, and education in the Netherlands: cognitive and noncognitive outcomes after an era of secularisation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40 (4), 561-572.
Driscoll, M. E. & Kerchner, C. t. (1999). the implications of social capital for schools, communities, and cities: educational administration as if a sense of place mattered. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (eds.). Handbook of research on educational administration. 2nd edition. San Francis- co: Jossey-Bass.
Dronkers, J. (1995). the existence of parental choice in the Netherlands. Educational Policy, 9 (3), 227-243.
Duckworth, K. & Sabates, R. (2005). Effects of mothers’ education on pa- renting: an investigation across three generations. London Review of Education, 3 (3), 239-264.
Eccles, J. & Davis-Kean, P. (2005). Influences of parents’ education on their children’s educational attainments: the role of parent and child perceptions. London Review of Education, 3 (3), 191-204.
Echols, F. H. & Willms, J. D. (1995). Reasons for school choice in Scotland. Journal of Education Policy, 10 (2), 143-156.
Edwards, t. & Whitty, g. (1992). Parental choice and educational reform in Britain and the United States. British Journal of Educational Studies, 40 (2), 101-117.
Ehrenreich, B. (1989). Fear of falling: the inner life of the middle class. New York, Pantheon.
Engel, L. (2008). Breaking the centre-periphery mould: exploring globalisation and educational governance in Catalonia. Globalisation, Socie- ties and Education, 6 (3), 265-279.
Fecho, B. (2001). toward literacies of engagement: the politics of compliance and school choice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33 (5), 621-630.
Finch, L. W. (1989). Choice: claims of success, predictions of failure. Education Digest, 55, 12-15, cited in W. Jeynes (2000). assessing School Choice: a balanced perspective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30 (2), 223-241.
Forbes, J. & Weiner, g. (2008). Under-stated powerhouses: Scottish inde- pendent schools, their characteristics and their capitals. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 29 (4), 509-525.
Fuller, B.; Elmore, R. & Orfield, g. (1996). Policy-making in the dark: illumi- nating the school choice debate. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore & g. Orfield (eds.). Who chooses? Who loses? New York: teachers College Press.
Gaffney, M. & Smith, a. (2001). an evaluation of New Zealand’s targeted individual entitlement scheme. In C. Hepburn (ed.). Can the market save our schools? Vancouver, British Columbia: the Fraser Institute.
Garrod, J. (2003). Faith schools. Sociology Review, 12 (3), 32-33.
Gelber, S. (2008). ‘the crux and the magic’: the political history of Boston magnet schools, 1968-1989. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41 (4), 453-466.
Geske, t. g. (2003). the new reality of school choice [Review of gill, B. P.;
timpane, P. M.; Ross, K. E. & Brewer, D. J. (2001). Rhetoric versus reality: what we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, California: Rand]. School Effecti- veness and School Improvement, 14 (1), 111-118.
Gewirtz, S. (2002). The managerial school: post-welfarism and social justice in education. London: Routledge.
Gewirtz, S.; Ball, S. J. & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Giddens, a. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gill, B. P., timpane, P. M., Ross, K. E. & Brewer, D. J. (2001). Rhetoric versus reality: what we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, California: Rand.
Gillborn, D. (1997). Racism and reform: new ethnicities/old inequalities? British Educational Research Journal, 23 (3), 345-360.
Glenn, C. L. (1989). Choice of schools in six nations. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education.
Glenn, C. & de groof, J. (2002). Finding the right balance: freedom, auto- nomy and accountability in education. Utrecht: Lemma.
Gokulsing, K. M. (2006). Without prejudice: an exploration of religious di- versity, secularism and citizenship in England (with particular referen- ce to the state funding of Muslim faith schools and multiculturalism). Journal of Education Policy, 21 (4), 459-470.
Goldhaber, D. (2000). School choice: do we know enough? Educational Researcher, 29 (8), 21-22.
Goldhaber, D. & Eide, E. (2002). What do we know (and need to know) about the impact of school choice reforms on disadvantaged stu- dents? Harvard Educational Review, 72 (2), 157-176.
Goldthorpe, J. (1996). Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: the case of persisting differentials in educational attainment. British Journal of Sociology, 47 (3), 481-505.
Gorard, S. (1996). three steps to ‘heaven’? the family and school choice. Educational Review, 48 (3), 237-252.
Gorard, S. (2009). What are academies the answer to? Journal of Education Policy, 24 (1), 101-113.
Gorard, S., taylor, C. & Fitz, J. (2002). Does school choice lead to ‘spirals of decline’? Journal of Education Policy, 17 (3), 367-384.
Gorard, S., taylor, C. & Fitz, J. (2003). Schools, markets and choice policies. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Goyette, K. (2008). Race, social background and school choice options. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41 (1), 114-129.
Hammond, t. & Dennison, B. (1995). School choice in less populated areas. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 23 (2), 104-113.
Hardy, J. & Vieler-Porter, C. (1990). Race, schooling and the 1988 Education Reform act. In M. Flude & M. Hammer (eds.). The Education Reform Act, 1988: its origins and implications, 173-185. London: Falmer Press.
Hatcher, R. (1994). Market relationships and the management of teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15 (1), 41-61.
Hatcher, R. (1998). Class differentiation in education: rational choices? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19 (1), 5-24.
Holmes, g., DeSimone, J. & Rupp, N. (2003). Does school choice increase school quality? Working Papers, 9683. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER.
Honig, B. (1993). Why privatizing public education is a bad idea. In P. R. Kane (ed.). Independent schools, independent thinkers. San Francisco, California: Jossey Bass.
Hook, S. (1999). Failing schools and dying cities. Times Educational Supplement, May 7.
Howell, W.; Wolf, P.; Campbell, D. & Peterson, P. (2002). School vouchers and academic performance: Results from three randomized field trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21 (2), 191-217.
Hoxby, C. M. (1994). Does competition among public schools benefit stu- dents and taxpayers? Working Paper 4979. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER.
Hoxby, C. M. (1995). Is there an equity efficiency trade-off in school finance? Tiebout and a theory of the local public goods producer. Working Paper 5265. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER.
Hughes, M.; Wikeley, F. & Nash, t. (1994). Parents and their children’s schools. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hunter, J. B. (1991). Which school? a study of parents’ choice of secondary school. Educational Research, 33 (1), 31-41.
Jeynes, W. (2000). assessing school choice: a balanced perspective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30 (2), 223-241.
Jimerson, L. (2005). Placism in NCLB - How Rural Children are Left Behind. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38 (3), 211-219. accessed: Octo- ber 13th, 2008. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/ ueee/2005/00000038/00000003/art00006.
Karsten, S. (1994). Policy on ethnic segregation in a system of choice: the case of the Netherlands. Journal of Education Policy, 9 (3), 211-225.
Kiernan, K. (1992). the impact of family disruption in childhood on transi- tion made in young adult life. Population Studies, 46, 213-234.
Kirkpatrick, D. W. (1990). Choice in schooling: A case for tuition vouchers.
Chicago, Illinois: Loyola University Press.
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: children in America’s schools. New York: Harper Perennial.
Lee, M. J. (1993). Consumer culture reborn: The cultural politics of consumption. London: Routledge.
Lee, V. (1993). Educational choice: the stratifying effects of selecting schools and courses. Educational Policy, 7 (2), 125-148.
Lee, V., Bryk, a. & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Levacic, R. & Hardman, J. (1998). Competing for resources: the impact of social disadvantage and other factors on English secondary schools’ financial performance. Oxford Review of Education, 24 (3), 303-328.
Levin, B. (2001). Reforming Education: from origins to outcomes. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Levin, H. (1991). the economics of educational choice. Economics of Education Review, 10 (2), 137-158.
Levin, H. (2000). A comprehensive framework for evaluating educational vouchers. Occasional Paper No. 5. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, NCSPE, teachers College, Columbia University.
Lubienski, C. (2005). School choice as a civil right: district responses to competition and equal educational opportunity. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38 (4), 331-341.
Lynch, K. & Moran, M. (2006). Markets, schools and the convertibility of economic capital: the complex dynamics of class choice. British Jour- nal of Sociology of Education, 27 (2), 221-235.
Martin, M. & Burke, D. B. (1990). What’s best for children in the schools-of- choice movement? Educational Policy, 4 (2), 73-92.
Massey, D. (1995). Reflections on gender and geography. In t. Butler & M. Savage (eds.). Social change and the middle classes. London: University College Press.
Mcarthur, E., Colopy, K. W. & Schlaline, B. (1995). Use of school choice. Series Education Policy Issues: Statistical Perspectives. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics, NCES.
McElwee, M. (ed.) (2005). Choice and freedom for all: education policies for the next ten years. London: Bow group.
Meer, N. (2007). Muslim schools in Britain: challenging mobilisations or logical developments? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27 (1), 55-71.
Meier, D. W. (1992). Choices: a strategy for educational reform. In P. R. Kane (ed.). Independent schools, independent thinkers. San Francisco, California: Jossey Bass.
Mickelson, R. a. & Southworth, S. (2005). When opting out is not a choice: Implications for NCLB’s [No Child Left Behind] transfer option from Charlotte, North Carolina. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38 (3), 249-263.
Milne, a., Myers, D., Rosenthal, a. & ginsburg, a. (1986). Single parents, working mothers, and the educational achievement of school chil- dren. Sociology of Education, 59 (3), 125-139.
Molnar, a. (2006). the commercial transformation of public education. Journal of Education Policy, 21 (5), 621-640.
Moore, D. R. & Davenport, S. (1989a). Cheated again: school choice and students at risk. School Administrator, 46 (7), 12-15.
Moore, D. R. & Davenport, S. (1989b). High school choice and students at risk. Education Digest, 55, 7-10.
Moore, D. R. & Davenport, S. (1989c). High school choice and students at risk. Equity and Choice, 5 (1), 5-10.
Morgan, V., Dunn, S., Cairns, E. & Fraser, g. (1993). How do parents choose a school for their child? an example of the exercise of parental choice. Educational Research, 35 (2), 139-148.
Moynihan, D. P. (1989). What the Congress can do when the Court is wrong. In E. M. gaffney (ed.). Private schools and the public good. Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame University Press.
Murphy, J. (1990). Class inequality in education. In I. McNay & J. Ozga (eds.). Policy-making in education: the breakdown of consensus. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Nathan, J. & Ysseldyke, J. (1994). What Minnesota has learned about school choice. Phi Delta Kappan, 75 (9), 682-688.
Olasky, M. N. (1988). Prodigal Press: The anti-Christian bias of the American news media. Westchester, Illinois: Crossway Books.
O’Reilly, B. (2002). Why Edison doesn’t work. Fortune, December 9th. O’Reilly, R. & Bosetti, L. (2000). Charter schools: the search for community. Peabody Journal of Education, 75 (4), 19-36. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (1994). School: a matter of choice. Paris: OECD.
Parsons, C. & Welsh, P. (2006). Public sector policies and practice, neoliberal consumerism and freedom of choice in secondary education: a case study of one area in Kent. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36 (2), 237-256.
Parsons, E., Chalkley, B. & Jones, a. (2000). School catchments and pupil movements: a case study in parental choice. Educational Studies, 26 (1), 33-48.
Pearce, D. & gordon, L. (2005). In the zone: New Zealand’s legislation for a system of school choice and its effects. London Review of Education, 3 (2), 145-157.
Peltzman, S. (1992). The political economy of the decline of American pu- blic education. Working Paper 78. Chicago, Illinois: CSES, Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, the University of Chicago.
Peterson, P. E.; greene, J. P. & Noyes, C. (1996). School choice in Milwaukee. Public Interest, 125, 38-56.
Pollock, a., Shaoul, J., Rowland, D. & Player, S. (2002). Public services and the private sector: a response to the IPPR, Institute for Public Policy Research. London: Catalyst.
Powers, J. & Cookson, P. (1999). the politics of school choice research: fact, fiction and statistics. Educational Policy, 13 (1), 104-122.
Pring, R. (2005). Faith schools: are they justified? In R. gardner, J. Cairns & D. Lawton (eds.) (2005). Faith schools: consensus or conflict? Lon- don: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ranson, S. (1990). Changing relations between centre and locality in edu- cation. In I. McNay & J. Ozga (eds.). Policy-making in Education: the breakdown of consensus. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Rapp, g. C. (2000). agency and choice in education: does school choice enhance the work effort of teachers? Education Economics, 8 (1), 37-63.
Raveaud, M. & van Zanten, a. (2007). Choosing the local school: middle class parents’ values and social and ethnic mix in London and Paris. Journal of Education Policy, 22 (1), 107-124.
Ravitch, D. (1992). the role of private schools in american education. In P. R. Kane (ed.). Independent schools, independent thinkers. San Fran- cisco, California: Jossey Bass.
Reay, D. (1998). Engendering social reproduction: mothers in the educa- tional marketplace. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19 (2), 195-209.
Reay, D. & Ball, S. (1998). ‘Making their minds up’: family dynamics of school choice. British Educational Research Journal, 24 (4), 431-448.
Reay, D. & Lucey, H. (2000). Children, school choice and social differences. Educational Studies, 26 (1), 83-100.
Scalia, a. (1989). On making it look easy by doing it wrong. In E. M. gaffney (ed.). Private schools and the public good. Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame University Press.
Schagen, S., Davies, D., Rudd, P. & Schagen, I. (2002). The impact of specialist and faith schools on performance (Local Government Association Research Report 28). Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research, NFER.
Schindler-Rangvid, B. (2008). Private school diversity in Denmark’s National Voucher System. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52 (4), 331-354.
Schultz, g. (1993). Socioeconomic advantage and achievement motivation: important mediators of academic performance in minority children in urban schools. Urban Review, 25 (3), 221-232.
Sloan, K. (2008). the expanding educational services sector: neoliberalism and the corporatization of curriculum at the local level in the US. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40 (5), 555-578.
Smrekar, C. & goldring, E. (1999). School choice in urban America: magnet schools and the pursuit of equity. New York: teachers College Press.
Smyth, E. (2009). Buying your way into college? Private tuition and the transition to higher education in Ireland. Oxford Review of Education, 35 (1), 1-22.
Smyth, J. (2008). australia’s great disengagement with public education and social justice in educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40 (3), 221-233.
Spiro, J. D. (1988). aIDS: a focus for teaching sexual responsibility and ethi- cal decision-making. Religious Education, 83, 162-250.
Stambach, a. & Becker, N. C. (2006). Finding the old in the new: on race and class in US charter school debates. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 9 (2), 159-182.
Standing, K. (1997). Scrimping, saving and schooling: lone mothers and choice in education. Critical Social Policy, 17 (51), 79-99.
Symonds, W. (2000). Edison’s Chris Whittle: ‘winners of this race are chil- dren’, BusinessWeek, February 7th.
Taylor, a. (2001). ‘Fellow travellers’ and ‘true believers’: a case study of religion and politics in alberta schools. Journal of Education Policy, 16 (1), 15-37.
Taylor, a. & Mackay, J. (2008). three decades of choice in Edmonton schools. Journal of Education Policy, 23 (5), 549-566.
Taylor, a. & Woollard, L. (2003). the risky business of choosing a high school. Journal of Education Policy, 18 (6), 617-635.
Taylor, C. (2001). Hierarchies and ‘local’ markets: the geography of the ‘lived’ market place in secondary education provision. Journal of Edu- cation Policy, 16 (3), 197-214.
Taylor, C. (2002). Geography of the ‘new’ education market: secondary school choice in England and Wales. aldershot: ashgate.
Teelken, C. (1998). Market mechanisms in education: a comparative study of school choice in the Netherlands, England and Scotland. amster- dam: University of amsterdam Press.
Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: let’s be realistic! Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tomlinson, S. (1997). Diversity, choice and ethnicity: the effects of educa- tional markets on ethnic minorities. Oxford Review of Education, 23 (1), 63-76.
Tooley, J. (1993). A market-led alternative for the curriculum: breaking the code. London: Institute of Education / tufnell Press.
Tooley, J. (1994). In defence of markets in educational provision. In D. Bridges & t. McLaughlin (eds.). Education and the market place. London: Falmer Press.
Tooley, J. (2000). Reclaiming education. London: Cassell.
Tooley, J. (2007). Could for-profit private education benefit the poor? Some a priori Considerations arising from case study research in India. Journal of Education Policy, 22 (3), 321-342.
Tooley, J., Dixon, P. & gomathi, S. (2007). Private schools and the millennium development goal of universal primary education: a census and comparative survey in Hyderabad, India. Oxford Review of Education, 33 (5), 539-560.
Vincent, C. (2001). Social class and parental agency. Journal of Education Policy, 16 (4), 347-364.
Walford, g. (2008). Faith-based schools in England after ten years of tony Blair. Oxford Review of Education, 34 (6), 689-699.
Waslander, S. & thrupp, M. (1995). Choice, competition and segregation: an empirical analysis of a New Zealand secondary school market, 1990-1993. Journal of Education Policy, 10 (1), 1-26.
Wells, a. (1993). the sociology of school choice: why some win and others lose in the educational marketplace. In E. Rasell & R. Rothstein (eds.). School choice: examining the evidence. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.
Whitty, g. & Edwards, t. (1998). School choice policies in England and the United States: an exploration of their origins and significance. Comparative Education, 34 (2), 211-227.
Whitty, g., Power, S. & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: the school, the state and the market. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Willms, J. & Echols, F. (1992). alert and inert clients: the Scottish experience of parental choice of schools. Economics of Education Review, 11 (4), 339-350.
Witte, J. F. (1999). the Milwaukee voucher experiment: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Phi Delta Kappan, 81 (1), 59-64.
Witte, J. F. & thorn, C. (1996). Who chooses? Voucher and interdistrict choice programs in Milwaukee. American Journal of Education, 104 (3), 186-217.
Woodhead, C. (2002). Class war: the state of British education. London: Little Brown.
Woods, P. (1996). Choice, class and effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7 (4), 324-341.
Wringe, C. (1994). Markets, values and education. In D. Bridges & t. H. McLaughlin (eds.). Education and the market place. London: Falmer Press.

Número 3
Julio - diciembre de 2009
ISSN versión electrónica 2027-1182
PDF | HTML
Información sobre los autores
 
Para citar este artículo | To cite this article | Para citar este artigo:
Kelly, A. (2009). Juxtaposing some contradictory findings from research on school choice. magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación,2 (3), 89-110.
 
Preparación de manuscritos
Convocatoria
Contáctenos
¿Quiere ser evaluador?
 
Creative Commons License
MAGIS - Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación by Pontificia Universidad Javeriana is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 2.5 Colombia License
 
 

Magis - REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE INVESTIGACION EN EDUCACION
Facultad de Educacion - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana | articulosmagis@javeriana.edu.co, mabel.ayure@javeriana.edu.co